About h4831sc
About h4831sc
Blog Article
This can be alleged to be the "head over to" powder-or darn close to it- for almost any bottle-necked cartridge a person could handload. It really is the inspiration for so many pet loads, nevertheless I haven't been satisfied with the outcome.
They have got done identically for me. Like Anyone else I rushed to find the more recent SC version but have now switched again. Preferably you wish about a hundred% loading density. In case you have adequate case capability to the H4831(very long) you will be almost certainly much better off.
What is actually the main difference? Compression. Without the Excessive/heavy compression connected to the lengthy grain 7828, the pressure curve was altered as well as load fell apart.
Operate your load up with the precise powder (sc or typical) and great deal you are working with however. Exact same burn up rate doesn't suggest it's going to behave "exactly" a similar. I've found over a hundred fps difference between sc and mil-surp many H4831.
The sole variance as I comprehend it is that the SC was meant to function through powder measures greater (which it does). The longer grains usually do not feed very well at all in some measures. Thats my 02 :grin:
Any load data to support that? My very first assumed is it isn't gonna melt away all of the way and velocities is going to be gradual and everywhere. Might be a nice fireworks Screen!
I don't like to work up a load employing a person great deal of powder after which you can have to work up once again for the reason that I run out and also have to start out employing a new great deal number.
If you've some heavier .224" bullets, you could possibly look for a load that works Okay While using the 4831. The h4831sc bullets I tried that were around 70 grains wouldn't stabilize in my rifle, which had the typical fourteen" twist. The 70-grain Speer was the biggest bullet that could stabilize, but it did that superbly. It is a amusing-looking bullet using a rounded nose profile, but it surely shoots great and kills effectively. Deer out to about one hundred fifty yards al went down at once with rib-cage hits.
dioni.a.312 explained: In my expertise the one actual distinction is that the shortcut meters superior as a result of reloading gear. The moment it's loaded theres no practical change. I've listened to the shortcut could possibly have a little bit more rapidly melt away level but it seems insignificant. Simply click to broaden...
Why would I mention this? Just what exactly is my stage? I'm not sure that there is a authentic legitimate point aside from exactly what is well-liked with most has not been well known with me at h4831sc load data all in these instances. Do I just have a powder jinx or one thing? Only to tell you about how crazy I really am, tomorrow I am variety testing a pals new .
This is an more mature thread, you may not get a reaction, and could be reviving h4831 vs h4831sc an aged thread. Remember to contemplate creating a new thread.
Yes, You should utilize the identical load data for H4831 vs H4831SC, but the SC Model may help you get somewhat extra in scenarios in which you are maxing out case quantity with the common powder before reaching force limits.
Can I suppose that H4831 is usually substituted for H4831sc ? I do know the Actual physical distinction but will it have an affect on the burn or velocity? I believe not but I am not a hundred% positive.
IMR4831 and H4831SC are unique. Exactly where you will be confusing it and thinking that it is actually close is H4831 and H4831SC are quite similar. Individuals two are practically exactly the same other than H4831SC is built to smaller sized grains so it meters less complicated.